Korean Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
The Korea Society for Life Cycle Assessment
Article

전과정평가(LCA)기법을 이용한 농업용 저수지와 양수장의 환경영향비교

김영득1, 노리히로이츠보*, 이건모**, 김해도1
Young Deuk Kim1, Norihiro Itsubo*, Kun Mo Lee**, Hae Do Kim1
1한국농어촌공사 농어촌연구원
*일본동경도시대학
**아주대학교
1Rural Research Institute
*Tokyo City University
**Ajou University

ⓒ Copyright 2012 The Korea Society for Life Cycle Assessment. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Sep 05, 2012; Accepted: Sep 17, 2012

Published Online: Oct 31, 2012

Abatract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the environmental impacts of irrigation facilities using a Life Cycle Assessment tool and to compare two different types of water resources, dam and pumping station suppling 78% of irrigation water in Korea. Study facilities, Idong reservoir and Eunsan pumping station, are located in Ansung-Si, Gyeonggi-Do. Life cycle impact methodology used in the study is Eco-indicator99(E) to assess the environmental impacts of 1 m3 of agricultural water supply. This case study is a preliminary work to evaluate environmental impacts associated with water use in the boundary of the existing life cycle impact assessment method. The functional unit for comparison can be defined as a 1.5 billion m3 to supply irrigation water to the paddy field of 2,156 ha for 70 years. As a result of LCA of reservoir, most of environmental impact is derived from the use of construction materials in the construction stage like concrete and cement. Electricity consumption is a key issues of pumping station in the operation stage due to the fossil fuel use. It can be said that dam seems to be a more sustainable facility than the pumping station in the 70-year life cycle of this study excluding ecological impacts, depending on geological condition in Korea, though there is no consideration of land use and ecological impacts by inundation.