Article

이산화탄소 포집 수송 저장 누출의 전과정평가 연구

박기학1, 강헌2,*, 윤성택3
Park Ki Hak1, Kang Hun2,*, Yun Seong Taek3
Author Information & Copyright
1에코피엔지
2수원대학교
3고려대학교
1Eco P&G
2University of Suwon
3Korea University
*교신저자: 강헌 교수, (18323) 화성시 봉담읍 와우안길 17 수원대학교 환경에너지공학과 Tel: 031-220-2146 Fax: 031-220-2533, Email: hkang@suwon.ac.kr

ⓒ Copyright 2016 The Korea Society for Life Cycle Assessment. This is an Open-Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Published Online: Dec 31, 2016

Abatract

This study was set the scenario that carbon dioxide of 3 million ton per year emitted by coal-fired power plant was captured and compressed to a level of 95%, and stored underground. The composition of the impurities(5%) in the capture materials was assumed including the general air pollutant, such as CH4, N2O, NOx and Hg, etc, emitted by coal-fired power plant. Features of this study is not the purity of carbon dioxide, examinate the magnitude of the environment impact on the 1∼5% of impurities. In particular, the environmental impact of these impurities that appear high is examined.

Through the CCS, net avoidance effect of global warming was 3.88E+09 kg CO2-eq/kg.

Weighting result due to leakage in the case of 1% leakage was 3.03E+05 Pt in the water system and 5.77E+03 Pt in the soil system. And Weighting result due to leakage in the case of 5% of leakage was 2.88E+04 Pt in the water system and 1.51E+06 Pt in the soil system. The cause of the environmental impact of the soil system is higher than the water system appeared by mercury(Hg) and weighting factor of mercury was larger caused in the soil system. According to the weighting results of the environmental impact, excepting mercury, 5% of leakage was 5.42E+03 Pt in the soil system. In this case, the avoidance effect was 3.38E+05 Pt. That is, excluding mercury, it was analyzed that CCS can reduce the environmental load.

In the future, there is a need to further study the presence or absence of including an environmental impact assessment quantification of impurities and collecting materials for safe CCS. Also, it must quantify the environment effect of lower pH due to carbon dioxide and be a lot of research on the prediction of changes in the ecosystem.

Keywords: LCA(Life Cycle Assessment); CCS(Carbon Capture and Storage); GWP(Global Warming Potential); GHGs(Greenhouse Gases)