PDF Download
PubReader
Export Citation
Share Facebook
Share Twitter
Cited by 0 Article
Metrics (View:280)- Comparison of environmental performance for 3 types of cement by EU PEF Guide
QR Code of this Article:
Related Articles
Life Cycle Assessment on Cement Product
Korean J Life Cycle Assess 2002;4(1):23-29.
Water Quality Improvement impact analysis using life cycle Assessment of pressurized microfiltration device
Korean J Life Cycle Assess 2016;17(2):101-108.
A Study on The LCA Curriculum to Train of Life Cycle Assessment Experts
Korean J Life Cycle Assess 2021;22(1):7-13.
Life Cycle Assessment of Synthetic Naphtha by CO2 hydrogenation Technology
Korean J Life Cycle Assess 2020;21(1):27-31.
The Study on Environmental Impacts of Buildingusing Life Cycle Assessment of G-SEED
Korean J Life Cycle Assess 2018;19(1):15-20.
EU PEF Guide에 따른 3종 시멘트에 대한 환경성 비교
Published Online: Dec 02, 2020
요약문
다량의 온실가스를 배출하는 시멘트 3종에 대하여 EU PEF 방법에 따라 환경성평가를 수행하였다. 환경성결과는 환경지수로 산출하였다. 그 결과 포틀랜드시멘트의 환경지수가 가장 높은 1.17E-01으로 나타났다. 이는 포틀랜드 시멘트의 지구온난화 영향이 다른 시멘트에 비해 월등히 높은데 기인한다. 하지만 미세먼지 영향은 온실가스 배출량이 가장 적은 에코시멘트가 가장 높았다. 에코시멘트의 미세먼지 영향을 줄이기 위해 황산칼슘의 대체가 필요하다.
Abatract
Environmental assessment was performed according to the EU PEF method for three types of cement that emit large GHG emissions. The results were calculated as an eco-point. As a result, Portland Cement has the highest eco-point of 1.17E-01. This is due to the fact that the global warming effect of Portland cement is significantly higher than those of other cements. However, eco-cement had the highest particulate matter effect. The replacement of calcium sulfate is necessary for reducing the particulate matter effect of eco-cement.